The storm is blowing a bit about the sack BML story. In my personal opinion, since I also participate, I don't insult or mock the sack. We are not better than others in the same situation. So from the perspective of humans being greedy like dogs with each other, I can understand. No praise, no encouragement, but sympathy. What I don't like is the sack or the concept of cooking porridge too much. The coin of the sack has committed to tokenomics, but then mixes the lines to dump. Of course, the sack can say we are stupid, so we bear the consequences. ... well, it's true that anyone playing coins understands they have to bear the consequences. But the sack is theatrical, comparisons are not acceptable. Moreover, they go online to criticize those who buy coins from the sack as lacking this or that. Then people can't help but be angry and want to tear the sack apart :(( Then there's the case of CTO Antex exposing the sack as someone who benefits at the expense of others, but after the job, they just shift the blame. The sack tells people to go live solo with knowledge, to show each other their shirts. But the sack has planned everything from the beginning, with a fully signed liability waiver, mixing funds from 5 to 7 different lines. That CTO shouldn't show his face at this point, or else it will just frame the sack's case, turning it into a blank page =)) In general, the sack is also clever; at this point, if they don't stir up some thorns in the flesh, in a few years, when the laws are perfected, they will only have to sit there and negotiate solo knowledge on live :v